Line Segment: What Happened to the Run Game?

[USATSI]
Written by Adam Lunt

Oklahoma State went out and did exactly what they needed to do on Friday against South Alabama in dominating an inferior team, incurring minimal injuries and not exerting a ton of effort.

Between David Bowie and BlackJack references, I was able to watch the film of the first three quarters again, before the backups were substituted. Based off what I’ve seen, South Alabama isn’t a quality opponent, so please have that in mind when reading these observations. Nothing I saw indicates this being more than a 4-5 win team.  

Offensive Line

Let’s start with the offense line, which will most likely be the hot topic of criticism this week after a below average performance with the ground game.  

Pass protection was phenomenal, which is expected as USA didn’t really have any feared pass rushers.  Of 24 true drop backs, Rudolph had 21 clean pockets. The three exceptions were mainly caused by extra pressure applied by the USA defense, including two QB hurries that caused incompletions. There were a few examples of free blitzers coming off the edge, but for the most part the OL held up very well.   

I paid special attention to Aaron Cochran as he received a little criticism for his performance last week, and thought he was much better this week. Tevin Jenkins did play a few series at RG in for Larry Williams, and thought both held up well also.  

Larry Williams is beat here, I really don’t understand why. He was in the right position then came off his block to help Lundblade, mental mistake. 

I don’t have a lot of notes on pass protection. Limited pass rush threat, and a strong performance from the OL in pass protection led to a wealth of time for Rudolph to throw the ball.  

The run blocking is a different story, I made pages and pages of notes. Before you put the OL on blast, it should also be noted that the running backs didn’t do them many favors.  

To start off you always wonder if the blocking was poor, or if the defense was really keying in on the run to make things difficult. I charted the amount of players in the box for each play that wasn’t a clear passing down, so I omitted 3rd and long and most of the drive at the end of the first half.  

  • 6 man box – 35 snaps
  • 7 man box – 13 snaps
  • 8 man box – 2 snaps

USA ran Cover 1 for a good majority of the game, with mostly man coverage across the board with one high safety. Cover 1 generally allows you a little more flexibility to move some people around to help support the run game. Based off the activity of the LBs and safeties, you could tell that stopping the run was an emphasis, but the numbers above aren’t overwhelming and should’ve opened up plenty of pro-OSU numbers in the box for their running game.  

To be clear, this line isn’t an elite run-blocking unit. By no means did the OL dominate like maybe they should, and clearing consistent running lanes by mauling DL didn’t happen often. However, there simply weren’t a lot of missed blocks here, and although the running lanes weren’t huge, they were there. This is where we get back to holding some of the RBs accountable.

I thought Hill looked very hesitant on his run style and vision was lacking for sure.  Here are a few examples of what I’m talking about. You have a huge hole between RG and RT, 1 on 1 vs. a LB. OSU will take that matchup all day with Hill’s open field ability.

Cochran has seal on left side, we know that the right side DE is going unblocked and likely to crash down. Instead Hill takes the run away from play side and cuts back right into unblocked player. Not great.

This one is the worst. He could’ve easily bounced this outside left from the handoff for a big gain, there was also a cut back lane to the right once he cleared the LOS. He took neither.

Here is a great example of strong vision. This play is designed to go right and he cuts it up field into a monster hole, then cuts again for an extra 2-3 yards. This is what we are used to seeing with Hill.

There were few missed blocks or assignments from the OL in general, I think the biggest issue is just a lack of physicality overall. I’m liking what I’m seeing from Larry Williams, but he still needs to improve.  Outside of Keyes (watch here), no one shows the high physicality level that a really strong rush team has. From a run game perspective, you would love to see the OL jumping off the snap and winning the line of scrimmage. This OL doesn’t miss many blocking assignments, but DL are left with opportunities to shed blocks and make plays.  

Here is a great example of what I’m referring to from a physical perspective. Watch how Keyes/Lundblade drive this block 10 yards down the field. 

Here is a nice blocking set where Lundblade and Keyes are able to seal a nice hole. This simply didn’t happen enough.  The USA DL were able to fill the gaps they were responsible for too often.

Here is Cochran crashing down well to open up a nice hole for a first down. 

Overall I think the run blocking was average but OSU’s RBs left a lot of yards on the table. OL coach Josh Henson needs to continue to preach a physical/violent culture with the offensive line to continue to have success on the ground.  

 

  • Alec M

    Always wonder if RBs try to avoid injury during these kind of non-conf games.

  • Judy

    From an inside source and if you read about S Alabama the week before, the RBs knew the box would be loaded so no need to place effort on the run game. Thus the reason why Rudolph was 21 of 24. Its about making the right business decision and they made the right one at that so don’t criticize the holes missed or the lack of vision. It’s a W…..on to the next game!

    • Wtc

      There’s always a need for effort in every facet of life. If the RBs slacked off bc they thought box would be loaded, what’s going to happen when they are facing the Kstate or TCU or ou defense? Y’all think Gary Patterson isn’t going to squeeze the run? They dominated Arkansas at point of attack in run game and Arkansas o-line is much better at run blocking than ours.

      • OrangeTuono

        And running into the pile is hardly “playing it safe”.

        • GeoPoke

          nothing like landing on your big fluffy guys’ ankles

      • Adam M.

        They also have a terrible QB and WRs. Arkansas won’t beat you over the top and Patterson knew it. Rudolph & Co. is a completely different scenario, even if their o-line lacks what Arkansas has.

    • Tbeezy

      Did I miss something? Rudolph was 25-38.. He played well but not great, he missed a for sure TD to McCleskay and Ateman had a TD that he dropped.

      It was pretty sloppy game on the offensive end. Hopefully they tighten things up and put it on Pitt.

      • OrangeTuono

        25-38 against USA = mediocre passing and receiving.

        Defense was stellar in this game. Givem the credit.

        • Tbeezy

          Defense was awesome.

          Rudolph still passed for 330 and 3 TDs (easily could have been 5 TDs)

    • Adam M.

      I don’t understand not placing effort in the run game if the RBs are expected to be successful.

  • okstate4life

    I feel there is something to be said about the box being filled and S. Alabama selling out to stop the run and that certainly something to consider. However, one thing that I’ve always noted about elite teams is that even when lesser teams sell out to stop the run, they get punished anyways. We will face better defenses and if they make us one dimensional like SA did for the most part, we’re going to struggle even with the wealth of receivers that we have. Not saying that we’re not capable of being an elite offense this season but we still have some work to do before we get there.

  • OrangeTuono

    Great breakdown Mr. Lunt!

    • GeoPoke

      I agree. For everyone who does the, “why are you criticizing them? We won big and they didn’t score, so why do you think we played like crap?” Those people need to read these articles.

  • Alum in AZ

    Thanks for this kind of article.

  • Iceman

    I just felt like the offense as a unit wasn’t really trying very hard this game against a dramatically outmatched opponent. I’m not concerned much by anything I saw in this game offensively outside of some play calling decisions on 3rd and 2 (I hate when we throw it up on 3rd and 2). Is the O-line great? Hell no. Are they good enough? Probably.

  • OSU Student

    I’m not neccisarily worried long term, but I am concerned for the time being. Even if they did bring extra rushers to stop the run, that should lead to an easier passing game for mason. Add in the fact that the pass rush was poor, and he should have lit their secondary up. He really didn’t. Some of that could be credited to us knowing they were a far inferior opponent and running the least amount of our playbook possible, but the offense didn’t perform nearly as I expected them to. They still won going away, but if they had the offensive focus Friday that they did last Thursday, they could have hung 44 in the first half. I’m hoping it was just a result of a basic, vanilla offense. But if it’s not, they’re going to have to get better, or they won’t be in Dallas come December.

  • Steve Monnot

    What I don’t understand (and I’m no football coach by any stretch) is why they didn’t force USA to unload the box more by stretching the field with more pass plays. Rudolph could have easily had 500 yards passing with those defensive sets. I understand they want to be balanced, and that when they get up on an inferior team they throw some “hey, let’s try this” stuff in there. But take what the defense gives you instead of trying to force the issue. Yes, the RBs could have done a better job in picking the holes and hitting them quicker.

  • Doc Orange

    I wonder how much the RPO effected the run blocking. In another article today the RPO was discussed at length. Do we not have to worry about linemen run blocking far down field when Mason pulls the ball and throws?

    • Adam Lunt

      Definitely a concern. That is why most RPO routes are quick, so QB can pull and unload the ball before lineman has opportunity to pass 3 yard threshold. Usually bubble screen, slant or TE/slot WR pop pass are most common.

  • LG

    Was it my imagination that mason was much more accurate on his screen and slant (shorter) passes and uncharacteristically inaccurate on a number of his deep passes.