Recruiting Comparison: How OSU, Wisconsin Starters Stack up as Recruits in High School Rankings

Recruiting stars matter but are not the end all, be all — else Texas would definitely have been back by now and Oklahoma State would have been floating in Texas Tech territory for over a decade.

But recruiting stars and rankings don’t not matter entirely, either.

So who has the advantage as OSU faces Wisconsin in the Guaranteed Rate Bowl this week?

I crunched the numbers and came away surprised by the data. Both good and bad. The good came on defense, where OSU has the slight edge. The bad came on offense, particularly along the offensive line, where OSU not only is pretty average but also where Wisconsin has bullies. People joke about Wisconsin offensive linemen being built different, but man, that team knows how to recruit some big boyz.

OK, let’s jump into the comparison. First up: OSU’s offense. For all unranked prospects in the Composite rankings they received a 75.00 average ranking so as not to entirely skew the data unfavorably.

POS	Player	247 Composite
QB	Garret Rangel	89.06
RB	Ollie Gordon	91.25
WR	Brennan Presley	85.65
WR	Bryson Green	88.75
WR	Braydon Johnson	84.39
WR	John Paul Richardson	85.44
TE	Braden Cassity	85
LT	Caleb Etienne	85.96
LG	Taylor Miterko	86.01
OC	Preston Wilson	86.01
RG	Hunter Woodard	85.73
RT	Jake Springfield	NR
	Average	85.69

Interesting, right? It’s just fun to look at. I used the latest depth chart from both programs to compare and contrast in this exercise. Wisconsin’s offense is below. Note: Wisconsin has two QBs and hasn’t publicly committed to one or the other for the bowl game after its starter hit the portal. (Sound familiar?) So I averaged out each of their Composite scores to compile the total data below.

POS	Player	247 Composite
QB	Chase Wolf/Myles Burkett	85.26/87.07
RB	Braelon Allen	91.59
WR	Chimere Dike	87.27
WR	Skyler Bell	85.78
WR	Keontez Lewis	88.26
WR	Dean Engram	85.8
FB	Jackson Acker	87.63
TE	Hayden Rucci	88.37
LT	Jack Nelson	95.39
LG	Michael Furtney	86.14
OC	Tanor Bortolini	85.52
RG	Trey Wedig	96.41
RT	Riley Mahlman	93.79
	Average	89.09

The takeaway: Wisconsin has far more “talent” in terms of recruiting stars at their respective starter spots. This is especially apparent along the offensive line where Wisconsin’s unit ranked 91.45 on average and OSU’s unit — again factoring in unranked recruits as a 75.00 overall grade — with a total grade of 83.74.

So the defense?

The defense, my friends. The defensive numbers are promising. OSU has an 86.71 to 85.37 advantage here. None of Wisconsin’s starters were ranked higher than 89.00 in the Composite. (OSU has just one, but that one — Kendal Daniels — was a cool 95.78.) Here’s OSU’s defense.

POS	Player	247 Composite
CB	Korie Black	87.42
CB	Cam Smith	85.56
S	Kendal Daniels	95.78
S	Sean Michael-Flanagan	88.58
S	Jason Taylor	86.06
DL	Xavier Ross	84.85
DL	Sione Asi	84.94
DE	Brock Martin	84.43
DE	Collin Oliver	88.67
LB	Xavier Benson	84.89
LB	Lamont Bishop	82.62
	Average	86.71

Some really solid talent across the board. Collin Oliver is an All-American and didn’t crack an 89.00 ranking, by the way. C’mon, man!

Here are Wisconsin’s numbers.

POS	Player	247 Composite
NB	Cedrick Dort	82.54
CB	Alexander Smith	84.23
S	John Torchio	79.98
S	Kamo’i Latu	84.64
CB	Jay Shaw	86.49
DL	Gio Paez	85.81
DE	Isaiah Mullens	86.14
DE	Rodas Johnson	88.58
LB	CJ Goetz	86
LB	Jordan Turner	86.8
LB	Maema Njongmeta	87.84
	Average	85.37

The takeaway: If you’re to put stock into recruiting rankings and how they might impact on-field play — which is problematic but play along with me! — it appears Wisconsin’s secondary would be the most vulnerable. That doesn’t entirely check out — Wisconsin is about middle-of-the-pack in the Big Ten in defending the pass — but its certainly a more viable attack than trying to gain through the ground game. Wisconsin has a stingy run defense that ranks third-best among Big Ten teams this season in yards rushing allowed per game.